Practice Perfect - PRESENT Podiatry
Practice Perfect
top title divider

Separate And Not Equal

lower title divider
Jarrod Shapiro
x-ray tech looking at foot x-rays on a computer screen

Out of the blue comes a volley of idiocy from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) with a new proposed rule that, among other things, would require podiatrists to use different evaluation and management coding from other physicians with a lower reimbursement amount.


This proposed change is outrageous and discriminatory.


Here’s the very basic and boiled down explanation. For those interested, read the full 1472 page proposal here (we have highlighted all sections relevant to podiatrists).

  1. CMS argues that the current Evaluation and Management (E/M) system is overly burdensome for physicians.  
  2. They propose to improve this by changing the current E/M system by changing the prior codes for new and returning patients (9920x and 9921x) to a single code with one weighted reimbursement amount for the 99202 (99212) to 99205 (99215) codes. There would essentially be one code with one relative value unit (RVU) used to calculate reimbursement to physicians.  
  3. They also propose to separate out podiatric physicians with their own E/M code (new G-codes) that is separate from all other physicians. 
Get a steady stream of all the NEW PRESENT Podiatry e-Learning by becoming our Facebook Fan. Effective e-Learning and a Colleague Network awaits you.

According to the proposal, “The single payment rate for E/M code levels 2 through 5 would benefit podiatry the most because, due to the nature of most podiatric E/M visits, they tend to bill only level 2 and 3 E/M visits.” This is a complete falsehood. Many podiatric patients require higher levels of E/M coding due to the same complex medical conditions that their other physicians are treating. Are you telling me that an orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon seeing a diabetic patient pending a Charcot reconstruction (who would now code under the new proposed rules along with all other physicians) should code a higher E/M code and should receive more reimbursement? Absolutely not. This is the same patient with the same complex medical conditions, requiring the same treatment. It’s simply discriminatory to assume podiatrists don’t practice the same medicine as everyone else.


“It’s simply discriminatory to assume podiatrists don’t practice the same medicine as everyone else.”


Additionally, podiatrists stand to lose – not make - money in comparison with other medical specialties. According to this very report, “The estimated impacts for several specialties, including allergy/immunology, diagnostic testing facilities, hematology/oncology, radiation therapy centers, and podiatry, reflect decreases in payments relative to payment to other physician specialties” (pg. 1026).

Podiatrists are recognized by Medicare as physicians, but adoption of this proposal will serve to separate us from the other medical professions, creating an underclass where we are devalued by the government: separate and not equal. This is an intolerable situation and threatens our profession. Simplifying medical billing is one thing, but creating a medical apartheid is another.


“Adoption of this proposal will serve to separate us from the other medical professions, creating an underclass where we are devalued by the government: separate and not equal”


The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) has a good explanation of these proposals here

The section in the executive summary that pertains specifically to separating out podiatrists is located on page 344 of the proposal. We have highlighted all sections relevant to podiatrists.

Subscribe Now To see Conference Videos, Interviews, Sneak Peek Lecture Videos, and More!

I urge all of you to communicate your disagreement with this proposal. Follow the APMA’s lead by reading the section below straight from the APMA information email:

WHAT YOU CAN DO:

APMA makes it very easy to contact your U.S. Congressional Representative and voice your disagreement with this proposed policy change. Go to the APMA eAdvocacy website by clicking HERE to access a pre-drafted comment letter to CMS. You are welcome to add any additional constructive thoughts you have. Comment letters MUST be submitted by September 10, 2018. This will, literally, take you less than 5 minutes to do. EVERY podiatrist and their families should do this immediately!

Please share the following link with your patients, family, and friends: https://www.apma.org/eadvocacy

  • Contact your U.S. Congressional representatives to express your opposition and submit your comments opposing this proposed rule in writing by September 10, if you haven’t already done so. Attached are APMA’s template letter you can customize and their fact sheet on the issue to use for background. 
  • We also urge you to distribute a request to faculty, staff, patients, and others to do the same.
Join Now  To get the Latest News, Press Releases, Announcements, Conference Information, and More!

HOW TO FIND YOUR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS:

  • Click on this link: https://contactingcongress.org/ 
  • Put in your zip code to filter your Senators and Representatives 
  • Click on the email icon to send an email. Their phone numbers are also provided.

If you have any specific questions about the proposed rule, please contact APMA at [email protected]

If you want to be treated like less than other doctors and abrogate all of the progress we have made as a profession, then, by all means, do nothing. If you want to be treated like other physicians, then follow the directions above and communicate your disagreement with this proposal. Don’t let others determine our future.

Best Wishes.
Jarrod Shapiro Signature
Jarrod Shapiro, DPM
PRESENT Practice Perfect Editor
[email protected]
article bottom border

This ezine was made possible through the support of our sponsors:

Grand Sponsor




Major Sponsor